SNAP Benefits
The Farm Bill Could Gut SNAP Benefits for New Yorkers
The Farm Bill, a comprehensive piece of legislation passed by Congress approximately every five years, plays a pivotal role in shaping agricultural policy and food assistance programs in the United States. Among its many components, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) stands out as a cornerstone, particularly in states like New York, where it is a crucial support system for millions of residents.
-
SNAP, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program, provides financial assistance to low-income individuals and families to purchase food. The program is designed to alleviate food insecurity and ensure that vulnerable populations can access adequate nutrition. Benefits are distributed through an Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) card, which recipients use to buy eligible food items at authorized retailers.
SNAP funding constitutes themost significant portion of the Farm Bill's budget, reflecting its importance in the national effort to combat hunger and promote nutrition. SNAP is essential for individual recipients and the broader economy, as itsupports local businesses and stimulates economic activity through increased food purchases. -
In New York, SNAP is a vital lifeline for many residents. Over 2.8 million New Yorkers benefit from SNAP, or 14% of the state's population. New York SNAP usage is higher than the national average of 12% of households. The program is particularly crucial in a state with significant income inequality, high living costs, and varying rates of food insecurity.
53% of SNAP participants in New York are in households with children, 48% are in households with at least one older or disabled adult, and 37% are in working families. The majority of New Yorkers utilizing SNAP have incomes below the federal poverty line. On average, households in New York see $233 in SNAP benefits per month – though that average increases when looking at households with children ($384) and working households ($314).
With its dense population and high cost of living, New York City sees asubstantial number of SNAP recipients. The program helps bridge the gap for many working families and individuals who struggle to make ends meet despite employment. In more rural areas of New York, SNAP supports communities facingdifferent economic challenges, such as limited job opportunities and lower wages. -
The current Farm Bill proposal includes nearly $30 billion in cuts to future SNAP benefits over the next decade, marking the most significant reduction since the 1996 welfare reforms. These cuts primarily target adjustments made to benefits under the Thrifty Food Plan, which determines the assistance recipients receive to purchase food. This change could significantly reduce the purchasing power of SNAP benefits, making it harder for households to afford nutritious food, particularly in high-cost areas like New York. Between 2027 and 2033, New Yorkers could lose $2,020 million in benefits. $11 billion worth of cuts would directly impact people with disabilities and older adults – which SNAP serves more of in New York than the national average. These cuts could lead to worse health outcomes and increased healthcare costs due to poorer nutrition among SNAP recipients.
The bill does include new investments in other nutrition programs, but new investments do not compensate for the significant harm caused by cutting future benefits for all participants. The proposed investments amount to only about half of the approximately $30 billion in SNAP cuts. As a result, the House Farm Bill would slash billions of dollars from crucial food assistance for low-income individuals to fund unrelated initiatives, failing to address the needs of those struggling to put food on the table.
The bill also proposessignificant changes to SNAP’s core mission, diverting its focus away from reducing food insecurity and potentially leading to impractical and stigmatizing monitoring of participants' food purchases. SNAP recipients are already subject to burdensome and stigmatizing monitoring requirements that mandate some recipients frequently report work activity, which can deter eligible Americans from utilizing the program. Now, lawmakers are furthering stigmatization of SNAP recipients by considering the creation of a pilot program to require grocers to catalog and restrict SNAP purchases – and another to collect SNAP purchasing data to be utilized with the goal of restricting SNAP even further. By proliferating stigmatization of SNAP, more Americans won’t get the help they need to feed themselves and their families.
As the legislative process unfolds, policymakers must consider the diverse needs of New York’s residents. Ensuring adequate funding and fair eligibility criteria for SNAP will be vital in maintaining the health and well-being of millions of New Yorkers, supporting local economies, and promoting food security across the state.